DoltHub's Honest Migration Assessment: Why They Haven't Switched Yet
When a company building database tools publicly documents their framework evaluation, you pay attention. DoltHub, makers of the Dolt Workbench supporting MySQL, Postgres, and their own versioned database, spent serious engineering time evaluating a Tauri migration for their Electron app. The verdict? They're staying put—for now.
The blockers are instructive. Windows Store distribution requires .appx/.msix formats; Tauri only supports .exe and .msi. macOS universal binary codesigning breaks during multi-architecture builds. These aren't deal-breakers for most apps, but they're showstoppers for enterprise software that needs smooth distribution channels.
The technical comparison, however, favors Tauri dramatically. Bundle sizes shrink by 10-15x. The Next.js integration is cleaner—Tauri's static-site export just works, while Electron requires the increasingly unmaintained Nextron workaround. And Tauri's Rust APIs feel more coherent than Electron's IPC patterns.
The takeaway: Tauri is technically superior for greenfield projects. But if you're migrating an existing Electron app with enterprise distribution requirements, your mileage will vary. DoltHub is keeping their migration branch open.